Sinton v. Sinton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sinton v. Sinton

749 So. 2d 532, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17266, 1999 WL 1258999

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 29, 1999

DocketNo. 99-00758

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 749 So. 2d 532 (Sinton v. Sinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sinton v. Sinton, 749 So. 2d 532, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17266, 1999 WL 1258999 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Sharon Sinton, challenges an order modifying the visitation provisions of her final judgment of dissolution. Appellant contends she was not given notice that the issue of visitation would be addressed at the hearing on the former husband’s petition to modify the final judgment. Because the court’s pretrial conference order did not list visitation as an issue in dispute, and because both parties filed pretrial statements indicating that the matter of visitation had been settled at mediation, we agree, and reverse. See Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.200(d); Lentz v. Lentz, 414 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

PATTERSON, C.J., ALTENBERND and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Sharon Sinton, challenges an order modifying the visitation provisions of her final judgment of dissolution. Appellant contends she was not given notice that the issue of visitation would be addressed at the hearing on the former husband’s petition to modify the final judgment. Because the court’s pretrial conference order did not list visitation as an issue in dispute, and because both parties filed pretrial statements indicating that the matter of visitation had been settled at mediation, we agree, and reverse. See Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.200(d); Lentz v. Lentz, 414 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

PATTERSON, C.J., ALTENBERND and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

749 So. 2d 532, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 17266, 1999 WL 1258999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinton-v-sinton-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack