Sinton v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad

36 A.2d 422, 131 N.J.L. 331, 1944 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 150
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 29, 1944·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of Jean Sin-ton and her husband awarded them for the physical injuries to her and consequential damages to him resulting from a fall which she sustained on the stairway in the defendant’s station at Ninth Street in New York City. The evidence was that she slipped on the inside of a banana which was on the step. There was no evidence that the presence of the banana had been, in fact, brought to defendant’s previous notice or that its presence on the step had existed for such space of time before the occurrence as would have afforded the defend *332 ant sufficient opportunity to make proper inspection of the stairway and remove it. In the absence of such proof, it was error to submit the case to the jury. Schnatterer v. Bamberger, 81 N. J. L. 558.

The judgment is reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sinton v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad, 36 A.2d 422, 131 N.J.L. 331, 1944 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 150 (N.J. 1944).

36 A.2d 422 (Sinton v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tua v. Modern Homes, Inc.
165 A.2d 790 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Kaufman Construction Co. v. Holcomb
55 A.2d 534 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)