Sintigo v. Pompeo

Opinion

JUAnSitOedN S Mtat.e Fs RAItEtoRrnSeOyN District of Nevada Nevada Bar No. 7709 VIRGINIA T. TOMOVA Assistant United States Attorney Nevada Bar No. 12504 501 Las Vegas Blvd. So., Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6530 Virginia.Tomova@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the Federal Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Susan Sintigo, Case No. 2:19-cv-00465-APG-MDC Plaintiff, v. Stipulation to Dismiss and Order Secretary Antony Blinken; United States Department of State Consul General Eric S. Cohan; Attorney General Merrick Garland; United States Department of Justice; DOES I-IX. Defendants. Plaintiff Susan Sintigo and Defendants Secretary Anthony Blinken, United States Department of State Consul General Eric S. Cohan, Attorney General Merrick Garland, and United States Department of Justice (“Federal Defendants”), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that her action be, and is hereby, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear its own costs and fees of suit. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Plaintiff's claims are moot considering the United States Supreme Court decision in Dep’t of State v. Murioz, issued on June 21, 2024. Id., No. 23-334, 602 U.S. __, 2024 U.S. LEXIS 2716. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claims should be dismissed with prejudice. Respectfully submitted this 28th day of June 2024. steer eS /s/ Michael D. Pariente, Esq. /s/ Virginia T. Tomova MICHAEL D. PARIENTE, ESQ. VIRGINIA T. TOMOVA Nevada Bar No. 9469 Assistant United States Attorney ) 3960 Howard Hughes Pkwy., Ste. 615 Attorneys for the Federal Defendants Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Attorney for Plaintiff IT IS SO ORDERED: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DATED: July 41,2024 0 2 of 2