Sintercast Corp. of America, Inc. v. Everglow Lighting Fixture Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sintercast Corp. of America, Inc. v. Everglow Lighting Fixture Co.

282 A.D. 1052, 126 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5796

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 1052 (Sintercast Corp. of America, Inc. v. Everglow Lighting Fixture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sintercast Corp. of America, Inc. v. Everglow Lighting Fixture Co., 282 A.D. 1052, 126 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property and for other relief, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order as denied its motion (1) for summary judgment; (2) to strike out defendant’s counterclaim for insufficiency; (3) to require defendant to make the counterclaim more definite and certain, and (4) to require defendant separately to state and number causes of action contained in the counterclaim. Defendant appeals from so much of the order as denied its motion for summary judgment .dismissing the complaint and for severance of the action as to the counterclaim. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ñolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property and for other relief, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order as denied its motion (1) for summary judgment; (2) to strike out defendant’s counterclaim for insufficiency; (3) to require defendant to make the counterclaim more definite and certain, and (4) to require defendant separately to state and number causes of action contained in the counterclaim. Defendant appeals from so much of the order as denied its motion for summary judgment .dismissing the complaint and for severance of the action as to the counterclaim. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Ñolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 1052, 126 N.Y.S.2d 906, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sintercast-corp-of-america-inc-v-everglow-lighting-fixture-co-nyappdiv-1953.