Sinram-Marnis Oil Co. v. Atlantic Towers Apt. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sinram-Marnis Oil Co. v. Atlantic Towers Apt. Corp.

190 A.D.2d 630, 594 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1682

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 190 A.D.2d 630 (Sinram-Marnis Oil Co. v. Atlantic Towers Apt. Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sinram-Marnis Oil Co. v. Atlantic Towers Apt. Corp., 190 A.D.2d 630, 594 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered December 20, 1991, which granted plaintiffs motion for a protective order as to certain interrogatories, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In this action for goods sold and delivered, the IAS Court properly granted plaintiff’s motion for a protective order with respect to interrogatories seeking information as to sales made by plaintiff to other customers, finding the interrogatories both overly broad and premature. The discovery sought has no relevance to the threshold issue as to whether there is an oral agreement between the parties as claimed by defendant. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered December 20, 1991, which granted plaintiffs motion for a protective order as to certain interrogatories, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In this action for goods sold and delivered, the IAS Court properly granted plaintiff’s motion for a protective order with respect to interrogatories seeking information as to sales made by plaintiff to other customers, finding the interrogatories both overly broad and premature. The discovery sought has no relevance to the threshold issue as to whether there is an oral agreement between the parties as claimed by defendant. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ellerin and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 A.D.2d 630, 594 N.Y.S.2d 151, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinram-marnis-oil-co-v-atlantic-towers-apt-corp-nyappdiv-1993.