Sinquah v. Hopi Tribal Courts

Hopi Appellate Court

Sinquah v. Hopi Tribal Courts

7 Am. Tribal Law 308

CourtHopi Appellate Court

DecidedAugust 20, 2007

DocketNo. 2007-AP-0003

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Am. Tribal Law 308 (Sinquah v. Hopi Tribal Courts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hopi Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sinquah v. Hopi Tribal Courts, 7 Am. Tribal Law 308 (hopiappct 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The above matter came before the Court on July 27, 2007, for a Hearing on a petition for an Extraordinary Writ (Habeas Corpus). The Petitioner is present without legal counsel. Yvette Navasie is present for the hearing with legal counsel, SheRie Penn. The eourt upon hearing from the Petitioner and Mrs. Penn finds the trial court did not err in sentencing the Petitioner to serve 15(1-1) days in jail. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED denying the relief as requested in the Petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The above matter came before the Court on July 27, 2007, for a Hearing on a petition for an Extraordinary Writ (Habeas Corpus). The Petitioner is present without legal counsel. Yvette Navasie is present for the hearing with legal counsel, SheRie Penn. The eourt upon hearing from the Petitioner and Mrs. Penn finds the trial court did not err in sentencing the Petitioner to serve 15(1-1) days in jail. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED denying the relief as requested in the Petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Am. Tribal Law 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinquah-v-hopi-tribal-courts-hopiappct-2007.