Sinnott v. McLaughlin
This text of 194 A.D. 919 (Sinnott v. McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed, with one bill of costs to appellants to abide the event, and plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs. The answers of the infant and adult defendants and by the defendants executors present issues to be determined by trial — (1) as to the existence of the trust declared in the deed mentioned in the complaint (Bates v. L. M. Co., 130 N. Y. 200, 205; Wright v. Douglass, 7 id. 564); (2) as to delivery of the deed; (3) as to possession of the real property by plaintiffs, required by Code of Civil Procedure, section 1638. Jenks, P. J.-, Rich, Putnam, Blaekmar and Kelly, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 A.D. 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinnott-v-mclaughlin-nyappdiv-1920.