Sinnott v. Ennis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sinnott v. Ennis

120 A.D. 874, 105 N.Y.S. 218

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D. 874 (Sinnott v. Ennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sinnott v. Ennis, 120 A.D. 874, 105 N.Y.S. 218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think the court acquired jurisdiction, that the facts alleged in the affidavit were sufficient to justify a finding that the defendant could not with due diligence be found within .this State, and that the sale under the judgment was, therefore, valid. It follows that judgment must.be directed for the plaintiff, but,-under the stipulation, without costs. Present—Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Lambert, JJ. Judgment for plaintiff, without costs. Settle order.on notice. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We think the court acquired jurisdiction, that the facts alleged in the affidavit were sufficient to justify a finding that the defendant could not with due diligence be found within .this State, and that the sale under the judgment was, therefore, valid. It follows that judgment must.be directed for the plaintiff, but,-under the stipulation, without costs. Present—Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Lambert, JJ. Judgment for plaintiff, without costs. Settle order.on notice. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D. 874, 105 N.Y.S. 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinnott-v-ennis-nyappdiv-1907.