Sinnissippi Insurance v. Farris

26 Ind. 342
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1866
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 26 Ind. 342 (Sinnissippi Insurance v. Farris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sinnissippi Insurance v. Farris, 26 Ind. 342 (Ind. 1866).

Opinion

Gkehort, C. J.

Suit by The Sinnissippi Insurance Company against the appellees on a premium note. The complaint shows that the amount due and unpaid for losses lay fire is $6,818; that the amount of the assessments are $27,782 86. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled. The appellees answered by the general denial. Trial by jury, and verdict for the defendants. Motion for a new trial overruled and judgment. In the progress of the trial the plfl.intiflF offered in evidence the estimate, the statement and the orders of assessment made by the board of directors of the company, to the introduction' of which the defendant objected. The objection was sustained and the plaintiff [343]*343excepted. This ruling of the court below is right. The amount assessed on the premium notes of the company' is greater than is necessary to pay losses. This rendered the assessment void. Sinnissippi Ins. Co. v. Taft, ante p. 240.

W. E. Niblack, W. II. De Wolf, J. E. McDonald, A. L. Roache and D. Sheelcs, for appellant. A. G. Donald, G. Denby and J. S. Tarkington, for appellee.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hobza v. State Farmers Insurance
252 N.W. 214 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1934)
Embree v. Shideler
36 Ind. 423 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Ind. 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinnissippi-insurance-v-farris-ind-1866.