Sinn v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

245 A.D.2d 1096, 666 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13884
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 31, 1997·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We agree with defendant that Supreme Court erred in awarding plaintiffs interest on the entire award of damages. The insurance policy at issue is not more generous than that required by regulation, and thus defendant must pay interest only on the limit of the insurance policy, not on the entire award of damages (see, 11 NYCRR 60-1.1 [b]; Dingle v Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 85 NY2d 657, 660-661). The court, however, properly directed that interest be calculated from the date on which the order of default was entered, because that order established defendant’s liability (see, Love v State of New York, 78 NY2d 540). We therefore modify the order and judgment by awarding plaintiffs interest only on the $50,000 policy limit. (Appeals from Order and Judgment of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Cornelius, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sinn v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, 245 A.D.2d 1096, 666 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 1096 (Sinn v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quigley v. Coco's Water Café, Inc.
85 A.D.3d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Van Nostrand v. Froehlich
44 A.D.3d 54 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Gordon v. City of New York
188 Misc. 2d 246 (New York Supreme Court, 2001)