Sinn v. City of New York

304 A.D.2d 504, 758 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4498
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 29, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about March 22, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained by plaintiffs decedent and for loss of consortium sustained by plaintiff, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants’ cross motions pursuant to CPLR 3126 to dismiss the action, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered June 26, 2002, which granted plaintiffs motion to reargue, and, upon reargument, adhered to the prior order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

In disobedience of a series of court orders, the elderly decedent did not appear for examination before trial and his attorney, who continues to represent his estate, did not comply with court directions to commence a guardianship proceeding. The result of this repeated disobedience was that the decedent died before defendants had an opportunity to examine him. Absent a reasonable excuse for the disobedience, dismissal of the action was a proper exercise of discretion (see Oberlander v Levi, 207 AD2d 437 [1994]; Pimental v City of New York, 246 AD2d 467, 468 [1998]). We have considered and rejected plaintiffs other arguments. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sinn v. City of New York, 304 A.D.2d 504, 758 N.Y.S.2d 328, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4498 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

304 A.D.2d 504 (Sinn v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Milton v. 305/72 Owners Corp.
19 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)