Sinks v. International Automobile League
This text of 162 A.D. 935 (Sinks v. International Automobile League) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed, with costs, the directed verdict set aside and defendant’s motion for dismissal of the plaintiff’s complaint granted, with costs. Held, that the defendant being, as to the State of Ohio, a foreign corporation, service of process on Rumstay did not give the court of that State in which the judgment sued upon in this action was recovered, jurisdiction of the defendant, it having been proved in this action that he was not a managing agent of defendant, within the meaning of that term as used in the statutes of that State, prescribing the method of service of process on foreign corporations,
See General Code of Ohio, § 11290.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 A.D. 935, 147 N.Y.S. 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinks-v-international-automobile-league-nyappdiv-1914.