Sinkler v. Conseco Life Insurance
This text of 528 F. App'x 370 (Sinkler v. Conseco Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Evelyn R. Sinkler appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Sinkler’s claims regarding a disability income rider to her life insurance policy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sinkler v. Conseco Life Ins. Co., No. 1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA (E.D.Va. Apr. 12, 2013). We also deny as moot the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as prematurely filed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
528 F. App'x 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinkler-v-conseco-life-insurance-ca4-2013.