Sinicropi v. Mazurek

Michigan Supreme Court

Sinicropi v. Mazurek

761 N.W.2d 89

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 3, 2008

Docket137077

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 761 N.W.2d 89 (Sinicropi v. Mazurek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sinicropi v. Mazurek, 761 N.W.2d 89 (Mich. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

761 N.W.2d 89 (2008)

Gregory G. SINICROPI, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Holly V. MAZUREK, Defendant-Appellant, and
Martin A. Powers, Intervening Defendant-Appellee.
Martin A. Powers, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Holly V. Mazurek, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 137077, 137078. COA Nos. 281726, 281770.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 3, 2008.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to address the constitutional due process issues related to the rights of the biological father.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

761 N.W.2d 89 (2008)

Gregory G. SINICROPI, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Holly V. MAZUREK, Defendant-Appellant, and
Martin A. Powers, Intervening Defendant-Appellee.
Martin A. Powers, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Holly V. Mazurek, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 137077, 137078. COA Nos. 281726, 281770.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 3, 2008.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to address the constitutional due process issues related to the rights of the biological father.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

761 N.W.2d 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sinicropi-v-mazurek-mich-2008.

Opinion

Gregory G. SINICROPI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Holly V. MAZUREK, Defendant-Appellant, and Martin A. Powers, Intervening Defendant-Appellee. Martin A. Powers, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Holly V. Mazurek, Defendant-Appellant.

Order

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Gregory G. SINICROPI, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Holly V. MAZUREK, Defendant-Appellant, and
Martin A. Powers, Intervening Defendant-Appellee.
Martin A. Powers, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Holly V. Mazurek, Defendant-Appellant.