Singleton v. Wulff

Supreme Court

Singleton v. Wulff

422 U.S. 1041, 95 S. Ct. 2655, 45 L. Ed. 2d 692, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 2082

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Singleton v. Wulff. Read the opinion of the Court — 428 U.S. 106 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 23, 1975·No. No. 74-1393·Published

Opinion

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:

“1. Whether there is a logical nexus between the status of respondent-physicians and the claims they seek to have adjudicated sufficient to confer standing on them to challenge the constitutionality of Section 208.152, RSMo Supp. 1973.

“2. Whether the Court of Appeals acted in excess of its jurisdiction when it proceeded to determine on the merits the constitutionality of Section 208.152, RSMo Supp. 1973.”

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 508 F. 2d 1211.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:

“1. Whether there is a logical nexus between the status of respondent-physicians and the claims they seek to have adjudicated sufficient to confer standing on them to challenge the constitutionality of Section 208.152, RSMo Supp. 1973.

“2. Whether the Court of Appeals acted in excess of its jurisdiction when it proceeded to determine on the merits the constitutionality of Section 208.152, RSMo Supp. 1973.”

Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 508 F. 2d 1211.

Singleton v. Wulff, 422 U.S. 1041, 95 S. Ct. 2655, 45 L. Ed. 2d 692, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 2082 (1975).

Pincite

422 U.S. 1041 (Singleton v. Wulff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.