Singleton v. United States

471 F. App'x 112
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2012·No. No. 11-7595·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Singleton appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his civil rights claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). Limiting our review to the issues raised in Singleton’s informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we find no reversible error and affirm the district court’s judgment. Singleton v. United States, No. 8:11-cv-01198-TMC, 2011 WL 5508998 (D.S.C. Nov. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singleton v. United States, 471 F. App'x 112 (4th Cir. 2012).

471 F. App'x 112 (Singleton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)