Singleton v. State Savings Bank

81 So. 159, 77 Fla. 202
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 21, 1919·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having been submitted to the Court at a former term thereof upon the transcript of the record of the decree aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said de.cree; it is,' therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singleton v. State Savings Bank, 81 So. 159, 77 Fla. 202 (Fla. 1919).

81 So. 159 (Singleton v. State Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steele v. Freel
25 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1946)