Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Singleton v. State

Singleton v. State

227 S.E.2d 472, 138 Ga. App. 706, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2293
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 20, 1976·No. 52182·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

1. A motion to suppress evidence which is made orally is procedurally defective and a denial thereof is authorized. Code Ann. § 27-313 (b); Graves v. State, 135 Ga. App. 921 (219 SE2d 633).

2. Appellant complains of a portion of the district attorney’s closing argument. However, no objection was made at trial, and no reversible error appears. Gerdine v. State, 136 Ga. App. 561, 562 (3) (222 SE2d 128).

3. The evidence authorized the guilty verdict, and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singleton v. State, 227 S.E.2d 472, 138 Ga. App. 706, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

227 S.E.2d 472 (Singleton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dennis v. State
305 S.E.2d 443 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Rick v. State
263 S.E.2d 213 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Jones v. State
250 S.E.2d 500 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Haygood v. State
236 S.E.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Bell v. State
233 S.E.2d 253 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)