Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Singleton v. State

Singleton v. State

227 S.E.2d 472, 138 Ga. App. 706, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2293
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 20, 1976
Docket52182
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 227 S.E.2d 472 (Singleton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Singleton v. State, 227 S.E.2d 472, 138 Ga. App. 706, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2293 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Webb, Judge.

1. A motion to suppress evidence which is made orally is procedurally defective and a denial thereof is authorized. Code Ann. § 27-313 (b); Graves v. State, 135 Ga. App. 921 (219 SE2d 633).

2. Appellant complains of a portion of the district attorney’s closing argument. However, no objection was made at trial, and no reversible error appears. Gerdine v. State, 136 Ga. App. 561, 562 (3) (222 SE2d 128).

3. The evidence authorized the guilty verdict, and the general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dennis v. State
305 S.E.2d 443 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Rick v. State
263 S.E.2d 213 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)
Jones v. State
250 S.E.2d 500 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Haygood v. State
236 S.E.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)
Bell v. State
233 S.E.2d 253 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 S.E.2d 472, 138 Ga. App. 706, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singleton-v-state-gactapp-1976.