Singleton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Singleton v. State

760 So. 2d 250, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6535, 2000 WL 689589

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 31, 2000

DocketNo. 2D99-1165

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 760 So. 2d 250 (Singleton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singleton v. State, 760 So. 2d 250, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6535, 2000 WL 689589 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Singleton appeals a sentence of 38 months’ imprisonment imposed as a result of his conviction for possession of cocaine and possession of paraphernalia. Mr. Singleton does not challenge the conviction. We reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing, because the State included on the sentencing scoresheet, over objection, convictions that were not established by certified copies of the judgments. See Kincaid v. State, 734 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). On remand, the State may produce evidence of the prior convictions or remove them from the scoresheet.

Reversed and remanded.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and GREEN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles Singleton appeals a sentence of 38 months’ imprisonment imposed as a result of his conviction for possession of cocaine and possession of paraphernalia. Mr. Singleton does not challenge the conviction. We reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing, because the State included on the sentencing scoresheet, over objection, convictions that were not established by certified copies of the judgments. See Kincaid v. State, 734 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). On remand, the State may produce evidence of the prior convictions or remove them from the scoresheet.

Reversed and remanded.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and GREEN, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

760 So. 2d 250, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6535, 2000 WL 689589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singleton-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack