Singleton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Singleton v. State

760 So. 2d 250, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6535, 2000 WL 689589

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2000·No. No. 2D99-1165·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles Singleton appeals a sentence of 38 months’ imprisonment imposed as a result of his conviction for possession of cocaine and possession of paraphernalia. Mr. Singleton does not challenge the conviction. We reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing, because the State included on the sentencing scoresheet, over objection, convictions that were not established by certified copies of the judgments. See Kincaid v. State, 734 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). On remand, the State may produce evidence of the prior convictions or remove them from the scoresheet.

Reversed and remanded.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and GREEN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Charles Singleton appeals a sentence of 38 months’ imprisonment imposed as a result of his conviction for possession of cocaine and possession of paraphernalia. Mr. Singleton does not challenge the conviction. We reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing, because the State included on the sentencing scoresheet, over objection, convictions that were not established by certified copies of the judgments. See Kincaid v. State, 734 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). On remand, the State may produce evidence of the prior convictions or remove them from the scoresheet.

Reversed and remanded.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and GREEN, JJ„ concur.

Singleton v. State, 760 So. 2d 250, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6535, 2000 WL 689589 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

760 So. 2d 250 (Singleton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related