Singleton v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Singleton v. State

65 S.W.3d 888, 347 Ark. 592, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 88

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 7, 2002

DocketCR 02-057

StatusPublished

This text of 65 S.W.3d 888 (Singleton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singleton v. State, 65 S.W.3d 888, 347 Ark. 592, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 88 (Ark. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

P 'ER CURIAM.

Appellant, Undra Monta Singleton, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Don G. Gillaspie, states in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Therefore, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

P 'ER CURIAM.

Appellant, Undra Monta Singleton, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Don G. Gillaspie, states in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Therefore, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 S.W.3d 888, 347 Ark. 592, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singleton-v-state-ark-2002.