Singleton v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Singleton v. State

65 S.W.3d 888, 347 Ark. 592, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 88

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 7, 2002·No. CR 02-057·Published

Opinion

P 'ER CURIAM.

Appellant, Undra Monta Singleton, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Don G. Gillaspie, states in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Therefore, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

P 'ER CURIAM.

Appellant, Undra Monta Singleton, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Don G. Gillaspie, states in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Therefore, the motion is granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Singleton v. State, 65 S.W.3d 888, 347 Ark. 592, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 88 (Ark. 2002).

Pincite

65 S.W.3d 888 (Singleton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.