Singleton v. Ross

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Singleton v. Ross

664 So. 2d 1326, 94 La.App. 4 Cir. 1947, 1995 La. App. LEXIS 3110, 1995 WL 689496

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 16, 1995

DocketNos. 94-CA-1947, 94-CA-1948 and 94-CA-1949

StatusPublished

This text of 664 So. 2d 1326 (Singleton v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singleton v. Ross, 664 So. 2d 1326, 94 La.App. 4 Cir. 1947, 1995 La. App. LEXIS 3110, 1995 WL 689496 (La. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons separately assigned the judgment of the trial court assigning one hundred percent of fault to Singleton and no fault to Ross is affirmed with Schott, C.J. and Plotkin and Armstrong, JJ., concurring and with Landrieu and Murray, JJ., dissenting;

The judgment of the trial court in favor of James Maher and against the Regional Transit Authority awarding attorney’s fees is reversed and set aside with all judges concurring except Armstrong, J., who dissents;

In all other respects the judgment is unanimously affirmed.

ARMSTRONG, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

PLOTKIN, J. concurs with reasons.

MURRAY, J., concurs in part and dissents in part for reasons assigned by LANDRIEU, J.

LANDRIEU, J., dissents in part and concurs in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI