Singleton v. Pickett
This text of 416 So. 2d 382 (Singleton v. Pickett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY. For the reasons stated in Number 82-275: Daniel Patrick Briggs v. United Services Automobile Association, 416 So.2d 377, it is hereby ordered, that applicant’s cost paid under protest in the sum of $250.00, be refunded and the Local Rule XIII(D) of the Ninth Judicial District Court, as amended, is herein found to be invalid and unenforceable as being contrary to LSA-R.S. 13:3050.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
416 So. 2d 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singleton-v-pickett-lactapp-1982.