Singleton v. Koch

Idaho Supreme Court

Singleton v. Koch

579 P.2d 110, 99 Idaho 164, 1978 Ida. LEXIS 394

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedApril 12, 1978

DocketNo. 12506

StatusPublished

This text of 579 P.2d 110 (Singleton v. Koch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singleton v. Koch, 579 P.2d 110, 99 Idaho 164, 1978 Ida. LEXIS 394 (Idaho 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff respondents Singletons sued to enjoin the defendant appellants Kochs from interfering with the Singletons’ use and improvement of an easement which they claimed to have across the easterly thirty feet of the Kochs’ property. The trial court entered judgment for the Singletons and enjoined the Kochs from interfering with their use of the easement. The Kochs have appealed, contending that the record before the trial court, which was composed primarily of stipulations, did not support the findings, conclusions and judgment of the trial court. We have reviewed the record and find the appellant Kochs’ contentions to be without merit. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

Costs to respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff respondents Singletons sued to enjoin the defendant appellants Kochs from interfering with the Singletons’ use and improvement of an easement which they claimed to have across the easterly thirty feet of the Kochs’ property. The trial court entered judgment for the Singletons and enjoined the Kochs from interfering with their use of the easement. The Kochs have appealed, contending that the record before the trial court, which was composed primarily of stipulations, did not support the findings, conclusions and judgment of the trial court. We have reviewed the record and find the appellant Kochs’ contentions to be without merit. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

Costs to respondents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

579 P.2d 110, 99 Idaho 164, 1978 Ida. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singleton-v-koch-idaho-1978.