Singleton v. Department of Highways

West Virginia Court of Claims

Singleton v. Department of Highways

16 Ct. Cl. 135

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedDecember 12, 1986

DocketCC-86-25

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Ct. Cl. 135 (Singleton v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singleton v. Department of Highways, 16 Ct. Cl. 135 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On June 6, 1985, between approximately 3:00 and 3:30 P.m., claimant's wife was operating her husband's 1977 Monte Carlo in a southerly direction, in Twilight, between Robin Hood and Bandytown, when the vehicle struck a pothole. The left front and left rear tires and a rim of the vehicle were damaged in the amount of $ 210.55.

Claimant's wife, Mary Ann Singleton, testified that she had driven her husband to his place of employment, the Peabody Coal Co. She was accompanied in his vehicle by his mother. Claimant's wife testified that it was raining and cloudy, and the road was wet. The vehicle struck several holes which were filled with water. Claimant's wife could not, by route designation or name, identify the road on which they were travelling when this incident occurred, it is a two-lane, asphalt road. Claimant's wife was driving at approximately 20 - 25 miles per hour. Claimant's wife did not travel this route on a frequent basis.

No evidence was presented to show that the respondent had actual or constructive notice of the existence of the pothole in question. Such evidence must be established in order for the respondent to be found guilty of negligence. Furthermore, the claimant has failed to show, to the satisfaction of this Court, that the road where the incident occurred is a State-maintained highway. The Court must therefore deny the claim.

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On June 6, 1985, between approximately 3:00 and 3:30 P.m., claimant's wife was operating her husband's 1977 Monte Carlo in a southerly direction, in Twilight, between Robin Hood and Bandytown, when the vehicle struck a pothole. The left front and left rear tires and a rim of the vehicle were damaged in the amount of $ 210.55.

Claimant's wife, Mary Ann Singleton, testified that she had driven her husband to his place of employment, the Peabody Coal Co. She was accompanied in his vehicle by his mother. Claimant's wife testified that it was raining and cloudy, and the road was wet. The vehicle struck several holes which were filled with water. Claimant's wife could not, by route designation or name, identify the road on which they were travelling when this incident occurred, it is a two-lane, asphalt road. Claimant's wife was driving at approximately 20 - 25 miles per hour. Claimant's wife did not travel this route on a frequent basis.

No evidence was presented to show that the respondent had actual or constructive notice of the existence of the pothole in question. Such evidence must be established in order for the respondent to be found guilty of negligence. Furthermore, the claimant has failed to show, to the satisfaction of this Court, that the road where the incident occurred is a State-maintained highway. The Court must therefore deny the claim.

Claim disallowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ct. Cl. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singleton-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1986.