Singleton v. Cannon
This text of 46 F. App'x 151 (Singleton v. Cannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charlena Singleton appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion to reopen her case and her motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Singleton v. Cannon, No. CA-99-3636-2-18 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 F. App'x 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singleton-v-cannon-ca4-2002.