Singleton v. Ballew

1916 OK 350, 156 P. 324, 57 Okla. 787, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 592
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 21, 1916
Docket6910
StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 350 (Singleton v. Ballew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Singleton v. Ballew, 1916 OK 350, 156 P. 324, 57 Okla. 787, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 592 (Okla. 1916).

Opinion

Opinion by

CLAY, C.

This cause presents error from the county court of Cherokee county, Okla. The plaintiif in error has filed with his petition in error a case-made in compliance with the rules of this court and has served and filed a brief, but the defendant in error has not filed, nor oifered any -excuse for his failure to file, a brief.

In such cases this court is not required to search the record to find some theory upon which the judgment may be sustained; and where the brief filed appears reasonably to sustain the assignments of error, the court may reverse the judgment in accordance' with the prayer of the petition in error. From an examination of the brief filed, we are of the opinion that the grounds for reversal therein urged should be sustained.

We therefore recommend that the judgment of the trial court be reversed, and the case remanded.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1916 OK 350, 156 P. 324, 57 Okla. 787, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singleton-v-ballew-okla-1916.