Singleton v. Anderson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Singleton v. Anderson

202 So. 2d 774

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 28, 1967

DocketNo. 776

StatusPublished

This text of 202 So. 2d 774 (Singleton v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singleton v. Anderson, 202 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

WEISSING, LOUIS, Associate Judge.

The defendant, Eddie Singleton, appeals judgment for the plaintiff, Timothy H. Anderson, entered upon verdict of the jury in a rear end collision.

A careful consideration of the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties establishes a factual situation that was properly submitted to the jury with instructions on last clear chance. Under such circumstances this court must sustain the verdict and judgment.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, J., concurs. CROSS, J., agrees to conclusion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WEISSING, LOUIS, Associate Judge.

The defendant, Eddie Singleton, appeals judgment for the plaintiff, Timothy H. Anderson, entered upon verdict of the jury in a rear end collision.

A careful consideration of the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties establishes a factual situation that was properly submitted to the jury with instructions on last clear chance. Under such circumstances this court must sustain the verdict and judgment.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS, J., concurs. CROSS, J., agrees to conclusion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 So. 2d 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singleton-v-anderson-fladistctapp-1967.