Singletary v. State
67 S.E. 1046, 7 Ga. App. 699, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 474
Opinion
No error- of law is complained of. While mere proof of a single act of fornication, or of even more than one such act, is insufficient to sustain a conviction of living in a state of fornication, the additional evidence in this ease, considered in connection with the proof of sexual intercourse, fully authorized the conviction of the defendant. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Singletary v. State, 67 S.E. 1046, 7 Ga. App. 699, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 474 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
67 S.E. 1046 (Singletary v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.