Singletary v. State

428 So. 2d 355, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20265
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 1983·No. No. 82-445·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged by information with burglary and grand theft. He was found guilty by a jury of trespass, as a lesser included offense of burglary. As to the grand theft count, he was found not guilty. He was adjudicated guilty of trespass and sentenced to a one year term of imprisonment.

Reversal is sought on the ground that the trial court erred in overruling defense counsel’s objection to a police technician’s testimony that the appellant’s fingerprints were obtained from him at the jail. Appellant argues that such statement to the jury deprived him of a fair and impartial trial.

We find no merit in this contention, and affirm. Parrish v. State, 366 So.2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and cases cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singletary v. State, 428 So. 2d 355, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

428 So. 2d 355 (Singletary v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parrish v. State
366 So. 2d 530 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)