Singletary v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Singletary v. State

428 So. 2d 355, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20265

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 22, 1983

DocketNo. 82-445

StatusPublished

This text of 428 So. 2d 355 (Singletary v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singletary v. State, 428 So. 2d 355, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20265 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged by information with burglary and grand theft. He was found guilty by a jury of trespass, as a lesser included offense of burglary. As to the grand theft count, he was found not guilty. He was adjudicated guilty of trespass and sentenced to a one year term of imprisonment.

Reversal is sought on the ground that the trial court erred in overruling defense counsel’s objection to a police technician’s testimony that the appellant’s fingerprints were obtained from him at the jail. Appellant argues that such statement to the jury deprived him of a fair and impartial trial.

We find no merit in this contention, and affirm. Parrish v. State, 366 So.2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and cases cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI