Singletary v. Mann

706 So. 2d 118, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1852, 1998 WL 75326
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 1998·No. No. 97-977·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

PER CURIAM.

We treat the Department of Correction’s notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari to review the trial court’s order prohibiting the Department from cutting inmate Mann’s hair. We grant certiorari and quash the order.

Based on the authority of Florida Dept. of Corrections v. Wilson, 606 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), Florida Dept. of Corrections v. Savariau, 600 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), and Florida Dept. of Corrections v. Wilson, 594 So.2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), we quash the. order and remand for further proceedings upon appropriate notice to the Department.

Certiorari granted; order quashed; cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singletary v. Mann, 706 So. 2d 118, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1852, 1998 WL 75326 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

706 So. 2d 118 (Singletary v. Mann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Singletary v. Griffith
712 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)