Singletary v. Mann

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Singletary v. Mann

706 So. 2d 118, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1852, 1998 WL 75326

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 25, 1998

DocketNo. 97-977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 706 So. 2d 118 (Singletary v. Mann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singletary v. Mann, 706 So. 2d 118, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1852, 1998 WL 75326 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

PER CURIAM.

We treat the Department of Correction’s notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari to review the trial court’s order prohibiting the Department from cutting inmate Mann’s hair. We grant certiorari and quash the order.

Based on the authority of Florida Dept. of Corrections v. Wilson, 606 So.2d 1285 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), Florida Dept. of Corrections v. Savariau, 600 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), and Florida Dept. of Corrections v. Wilson, 594 So.2d 330 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), we quash the. order and remand for further proceedings upon appropriate notice to the Department.

Certiorari granted; order quashed; cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI