Singletary v. Coronado

673 So. 2d 924, 1996 WL 252861
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 1996
Docket94-02886
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 924 (Singletary v. Coronado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Singletary v. Coronado, 673 So. 2d 924, 1996 WL 252861 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

673 So.2d 924 (1996)

Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections, Appellant,
v.
Byron CORONADO and Bishop Fashaw, Appellees.

No. 94-02886.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 15, 1996.

Judy Bone, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

No appearance for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Byron Coronado and Bishop Fashaw are inmates serving sentences in the custody of the Department of Corrections. After sentencing and commitment, Coronado and Fashaw were transported from the Department of Corrections' custody to the Sarasota County Jail, apparently at the state's behest. The purpose of the release was to permit them to provide testimony in the trial of State v. Reaves, then pending in the Circuit Court of Sarasota County.

On July 15, 1994, the Reaves court entered two orders requiring that Coronado and Fashaw be awarded full gain-time as if they had remained in Department of Corrections' custody performing work assignments. The orders were entered without notice to the Department of Corrections.

The trial court was in error. The authority to regulate gain-time resides exclusively within the Department of Corrections pursuant to chapter 944, Florida Statutes (1993), and it is only the department that has "the ability to award, forfeit, or restore gain-time." State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925, 927 (Fla.1989).

Based upon the foregoing, we vacate the trial court's order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FRANK, A.C.J., and FULMER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James Mobley v. State
263 So. 3d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Kenneth Purdy v. State
257 So. 3d 567 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Miller v. State
882 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Crosby v. Harvey
861 So. 2d 102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Moore v. Pearson
789 So. 2d 316 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)
Guedes v. State
705 So. 2d 716 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Singletary v. Dunlap
701 So. 2d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 924, 1996 WL 252861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singletary-v-coronado-fladistctapp-1996.