Singh v. State

135 So. 3d 1136, 2014 WL 1393039, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5325
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 11, 2014·No. No. 5D13-988·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, without discussion, the trial court’s finding that Bhupendra Ravi Singh (Appellant) violated his probation by committing new criminal offenses. However, the trial court failed to make the required written finding pursuant to section 948.06(8)(e)l., Florida Statutes (2012), as to whether Appellant “poses a danger to the community.” We remand for the trial [1137] court to make that determination and to resentence Appellant accordingly.1

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, COHEN and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singh v. State, 135 So. 3d 1136, 2014 WL 1393039, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5325 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

135 So. 3d 1136 (Singh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rachel E. Shinault v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Randall Mackenzie Brock v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
Barber v. State
207 So. 3d 379 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)