Singh v. State
This text of 135 So. 3d 1136 (Singh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm, without discussion, the trial court’s finding that Bhupendra Ravi Singh (Appellant) violated his probation by committing new criminal offenses. However, the trial court failed to make the required written finding pursuant to section 948.06(8)(e)l., Florida Statutes (2012), as to whether Appellant “poses a danger to the community.” We remand for the trial [1137]*1137court to make that determination and to resentence Appellant accordingly.1
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 So. 3d 1136, 2014 WL 1393039, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singh-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.