Singh v. Napolitano

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Singh v. Napolitano. Read the opinion of the Court — 649 F.3d 899
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 11, 2009·No. 07-16988·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAJINDER PAL SINGH,  Petitioner-Appellant, v. No. 07-16988 JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary D.C. No. CV-07-03943-MMC Department of Homeland Security; NANCY ALCANTAR, Field Office  Northern District of Director, Immigration and California, Customs Enforcement; ERIC H. San Francisco HOLDER Jr., Attorney General of ORDER the United States, Respondents-Appellees.  Filed August 11, 2009

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Jerome Farris and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges. ORDER

The case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for the limited purpose of ruling upon whether the Board had jurisdiction to hear Singh’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims and what effect, if any, the Attorney General’s recent opinion in In re Compean, 25 I&N Dec. 1, 3 (A.G. 2009), has on this case. The Board shall advise this court of any action or decision.

11163 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singh v. Napolitano, (9th Cir. 2009).

Singh v. Napolitano (Singh v. Napolitano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

COMPEAN
25 I. & N. Dec. 1 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 2009)