Singh v. McCrossen

111 A.D.3d 531, 975 N.Y.S.2d 336
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 2013·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J), entered July 26, 2012, which granted the motion of defendants-respondents (Gannett) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[532]*532Gannett established entitlement to summary judgment in this action where plaintiff was injured when, while walking to a bus stop on Gannett’s property, she was struck by a car driven by her coworker defendant McCrossen as she was leaving work. The motion court properly found that Gannett’s failure to provide a sidewalk leading from the front door of its building to a County bus stop on the property was not a proximate cause of plaintiff’s accident as a matter of law (see Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 NY2d 308, 315 [1980]). Instead, the fact that there were no sidewalks in the area of plaintiffs accident merely furnished the occasion for the accident (see Sheehan v City of New York, 40 NY2d 496, 503 [1976]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singh v. McCrossen, 111 A.D.3d 531, 975 N.Y.S.2d 336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

111 A.D.3d 531 (Singh v. McCrossen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schwartz v. City of New York
2019 NY Slip Op 2465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)