Singh v. Lynch

Eighth Circuit

Singh v. Lynch

604 F. App'x 523

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMay 14, 2015

DocketNo. 14-3003

StatusPublished

This text of 604 F. App'x 523 (Singh v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singh v. Lynch, 604 F. App'x 523 (8th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Amarjit Singh, his wife Manjit Kaur, and their son Dripinder Singh, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their fourth motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely and numerically barred. See Zheng v. Mukasey, 523 F.3d 893 (8th Cir.2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Amarjit Singh, his wife Manjit Kaur, and their son Dripinder Singh, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their fourth motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely and numerically barred. See Zheng v. Mukasey, 523 F.3d 893 (8th Cir.2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

604 F. App'x 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singh-v-lynch-ca8-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack