Singh v. Lynch

Eighth Circuit

Singh v. Lynch

604 F. App'x 523

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 14, 2015·No. No. 14-3003·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Amarjit Singh, his wife Manjit Kaur, and their son Dripinder Singh, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their fourth motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely and numerically barred. See Zheng v. Mukasey, 523 F.3d 893 (8th Cir.2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Amarjit Singh, his wife Manjit Kaur, and their son Dripinder Singh, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying their fourth motion to reopen removal proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as untimely and numerically barred. See Zheng v. Mukasey, 523 F.3d 893 (8th Cir.2008). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Singh v. Lynch, 604 F. App'x 523 (8th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

604 F. App'x 523 (Singh v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related