Singh v. Henderson
This text of 56 F. App'x 433 (Singh v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Appellant Mildred Singh failed to raise a material issue of fact regarding her discrimination action, as her appeal to the EEOC was untimely. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.402(a). The district properly granted summary judgment in favor of the United States Postal Service. See O’Connor v. Boeing N. Am., Inc., 311 F.3d 1139, 1149 (9th Cir.2002); see also Foss v. Thompson, 242 F.3d 1131, 1133-34 (9th Cir.2001).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singh-v-henderson-ca9-2003.