Singh v. Gonzales

Fourth Circuit

Singh v. Gonzales

139 F. App'x 527

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 19, 2005·No. 05-1114·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Vikram Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely his motion to reopen removal proceedings. As Singh raises no challenges to this order and instead raises issues relevant to an order of the Board of April 20, 2004, that is not before us in this appeal, we dismiss the petition for review. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Vikram Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely his motion to reopen removal proceedings. As Singh raises no challenges to this order and instead raises issues relevant to an order of the Board of April 20, 2004, that is not before us in this appeal, we dismiss the petition for review. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED

Singh v. Gonzales, 139 F. App'x 527 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

139 F. App'x 527 (Singh v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related