Singh v. Gonzales
This text of 139 F. App'x 527 (Singh v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vikram Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely his motion to reopen removal proceedings. As Singh raises no challenges to this order and instead raises issues relevant to an order of the Board of April 20, 2004, that is not before us in this appeal, we dismiss the petition for review. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 F. App'x 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singh-v-gonzales-ca4-2005.