Singh v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.
529 So. 2d 1235, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3579, 1988 WL 82526
Opinion
AFFIRMED on the authority of Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon, 482 U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2332, 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987); Kavouras v. Visual Products Systems, Inc., 680 F.Supp. 205, 207-08 (W.D.Pa.1988); Aronson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 675 F.Supp. 1324, 1326 (S.D.Fla.1987); Staiman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 673 F.Supp. 1009, 1011 (C.D.Cal.1987).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Singh v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc., 529 So. 2d 1235, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3579, 1988 WL 82526 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
529 So. 2d 1235 (Singh v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahon
482 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Kavouras v. Visual Products Systems, Inc.
680 F. Supp. 205 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1988)
Staiman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
673 F. Supp. 1009 (C.D. California, 1987)
Aronson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
675 F. Supp. 1324 (S.D. Florida, 1987)