Singh v. Data Palette Information Services, LLC

103 A.D.3d 534, 959 N.Y.S.2d 438

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered on or about October 26, 2011, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs failed to establish their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that they either performed under the contract or were excused from doing so (see Harris v Seward Park Hous. Corp., 79 AD3d 425 [1st Dept 2010]). Moreover, the record presents triable issues of fact as to whether defendant breached the Operating Agreement (see Boston Concessions Group v Criterion Ctr. Corp., 200 AD2d 543 [1st Dept 1994]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find [535] them unavailing. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Renwick, Freedman and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Singh v. Data Palette Information Services, LLC, 103 A.D.3d 534, 959 N.Y.S.2d 438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

103 A.D.3d 534 (Singh v. Data Palette Information Services, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Seward Park Housing Corp.
79 A.D.3d 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Boston Concessions Group, Inc. v. Criterion Center Corp.
200 A.D.2d 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)