Singh v. Battle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Singh v. Battle

303 A.D.2d 171, 755 N.Y.S.2d 235, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1947

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 303 A.D.2d 171 (Singh v. Battle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singh v. Battle, 303 A.D.2d 171, 755 N.Y.S.2d 235, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, J.), entered August 2, 2002, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by plaintiffs stipulation, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in this action for ejectment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted as to the cause of action for ejectment and plaintiff awarded sole possession of the subject premises. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

In view of plaintiffs postargument stipulation to waive all monetary claims for damages for arrears and all claims for [172]*172expenditures for repairs after the fire, there remain no issues of fact precluding summary judgment on his action for ejectment of defendant for nonpayment of rent. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Lerner and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, J.), entered August 2, 2002, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by plaintiffs stipulation, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment in this action for ejectment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted as to the cause of action for ejectment and plaintiff awarded sole possession of the subject premises. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

In view of plaintiffs postargument stipulation to waive all monetary claims for damages for arrears and all claims for [172]*172expenditures for repairs after the fire, there remain no issues of fact precluding summary judgment on his action for ejectment of defendant for nonpayment of rent. Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Lerner and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 171, 755 N.Y.S.2d 235, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singh-v-battle-nyappdiv-2003.