Singh v. Bardini

E.D. California

Singh v. Bardini

DecidedFebruary 17, 2023

Docket1:22-cv-01202

StatusUnknown

This text of Singh v. Bardini (Singh v. Bardini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singh v. Bardini, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 | HARMANDEEFP SINGH, Case No. 1:22-cv-01202-ADA-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 Vv. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 12 | EMILIA BARDINI, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendants. (ECF No. 13) 14 15 On February 16, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal. (ECF No. 13.) In light of the 16 | notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gii); Wilson v. 17 | City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice, 18 | with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 20 | the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 FA. 53 | Dated: _February 17, 2023 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 | HARMANDEEFP SINGH, Case No. 1:22-cv-01202-ADA-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 Vv. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 12 | EMILIA BARDINI, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendants. (ECF No. 13) 14 15 On February 16, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal. (ECF No. 13.) In light of the 16 | notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gii); Wilson v. 17 | City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice, 18 | with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 20 | the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 FA. 53 | Dated: _February 17, 2023 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Singh v. Bardini, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singh-v-bardini-caed-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack