Singh-Kaur v. Ashcroft
This text of 114 F. App'x 866 (Singh-Kaur v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Balihar Singh-Kaur, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997). We review for abuse of discretion, Celis-Castellano v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 888, 890 (9th Cir.2002), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Singh-Kaur’s motion to reopen because, in light of the adverse credibility finding in his underlying asylum, withholding of deportation, and Convention Against Torture proceedings, Singh-Kaur could not demonstrate prima facie eligibility for relief. See INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 105, 108, 108 S.Ct. 904, 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 F. App'x 866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singh-kaur-v-ashcroft-ca9-2004.