Singh ex rel. Singh v. United States
This text of 167 F. App'x 604 (Singh ex rel. Singh v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[605]*605MEMORANDUM
Harish Singh appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his habeas corpus petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Reviewing de novo, Brady v. United States, 211 F.3d 499, 502 (9th Cir.2000), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 F. App'x 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singh-ex-rel-singh-v-united-states-ca9-2006.