Singer's Estate
66 A. 548, 217 Pa. 295, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 701
Opinion
The learned court below found that while the bargain was unconscionable because of the, gross inadequacy of the price yet it was not fraudulent, and, therefore, could not be set aside.
The decree is affirmed on the opinion of the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Singer's Estate, 66 A. 548, 217 Pa. 295, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 701 (Pa. 1907).
66 A. 548 (Singer's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Penn Park, Inc. v. Falls Township Authority
51 Pa. D. & C.2d 360 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1970)
Norris's Estate
198 A. 142 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Hollowell's Estate
182 A. 779 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Carter v. Martin
162 A. 220 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)