Singer v. Zaret

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Singer v. Zaret

216 A.D. 820

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1926

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 216 A.D. 820 (Singer v. Zaret) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singer v. Zaret, 216 A.D. 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for an examination before trial reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, as to all matters asked for. Those disallowed relate to the alleged conspiracy and fraud which plaintiff must prove to sustain his cause of action. While the examination is unnecessary to enable plaintiff to give the bill of particulars, that fact does not show that the examination is not sought in good faith. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for an examination before trial reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, as to all matters asked for. Those disallowed relate to the alleged conspiracy and fraud which plaintiff must prove to sustain his cause of action. While the examination is unnecessary to enable plaintiff to give the bill of particulars, that fact does not show that the examination is not sought in good faith. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D. 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-v-zaret-nyappdiv-1926.