Singer v. Terminal System, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Singer v. Terminal System, Inc.

5 A.D.2d 788, 170 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7238

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 20, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 788 (Singer v. Terminal System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singer v. Terminal System, Inc., 5 A.D.2d 788, 170 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal (1) from an order dated August 20, 1957 (a) granting respondent’s motion to examine appellant before trial in accordance with a notice to examine and to strike out appellant’s answer if he fail to appear for examination, and (b) denying appellant’s cross motion [789]*789to vacate the notice and (2) from so much of an order dated November 6, 1957 as (a) adheres, on reargument, to the original decision directing appellant to appear for examination before trial in New York City, (b) denies, on renewal, appellant’s cross motion to vacate the notice, and (e) denies appellant’s motion to modify the order dated August 20, 1957 insofar as it directs his attendance in New York City. Order dated November 6, 1957 insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order dated August 20, 1957 dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal (1) from an order dated August 20, 1957 (a) granting respondent’s motion to examine appellant before trial in accordance with a notice to examine and to strike out appellant’s answer if he fail to appear for examination, and (b) denying appellant’s cross motion [789]*789to vacate the notice and (2) from so much of an order dated November 6, 1957 as (a) adheres, on reargument, to the original decision directing appellant to appear for examination before trial in New York City, (b) denies, on renewal, appellant’s cross motion to vacate the notice, and (e) denies appellant’s motion to modify the order dated August 20, 1957 insofar as it directs his attendance in New York City. Order dated November 6, 1957 insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order dated August 20, 1957 dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 788, 170 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-v-terminal-system-inc-nyappdiv-1958.