Singer v. State Employees Retirement Commission
This text of 626 A.2d 3 (Singer v. State Employees Retirement Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issue in this case is whether the trial court improperly dismissed the plaintiff’s administrative appeal by determining that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to the plaintiff’s failure to have a citation accompany his appeal by certified mail pursuant to General Statutes § 4-183 (c) (l).1
The defendant concedes that our Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tolly v. Department of Human Resources, 225 Conn. 13, 621 A.2d 719 (1993), controls [923]*923the disposition of this case.2 In Tolly v. Department of Human Resources, supra, 19, our Supreme Court held that service of process of an administrative appeal pursuant to General Statutes § 4-183 (c) (1) does not require a citation.
The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded with direction to deny the motion to dismiss and for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
626 A.2d 3, 31 Conn. App. 922, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-v-state-employees-retirement-commission-connappct-1993.