Singer v. Singer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Singer v. Singer

82 A.D.2d 828, 439 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14496

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.2d 828 (Singer v. Singer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Singer v. Singer, 82 A.D.2d 828, 439 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14496 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Oppido, J.), dated February 27, 1980, as, upon granting the parties a dual divorce, awarded plaintiff alimony in the sum of $25 per week. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the second decretal paragraph is deleted and plaintiff’s application for alimony is denied. Once the court granted the parties a dual divorce, the award of alimony to the plaintiff was improper (see Domestic Relations Law, § 236; Galietti v Galietti, 75 AD2d 613; De Marinis v De Marinis, 74 AD2d 815; Fomenko v Fomenko, 50 AD2d 712). We note that plaintiff has not appeared. Hopkins, J.P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, the defendant husband appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Oppido, J.), dated February 27, 1980, as, upon granting the parties a dual divorce, awarded plaintiff alimony in the sum of $25 per week. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the second decretal paragraph is deleted and plaintiff’s application for alimony is denied. Once the court granted the parties a dual divorce, the award of alimony to the plaintiff was improper (see Domestic Relations Law, § 236; Galietti v Galietti, 75 AD2d 613; De Marinis v De Marinis, 74 AD2d 815; Fomenko v Fomenko, 50 AD2d 712). We note that plaintiff has not appeared. Hopkins, J.P., Gibbons, O’Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.2d 828, 439 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-v-singer-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack