Singer v. Singer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Singer v. Singer

219 So. 3d 944, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7539

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 24, 2017·No. No. 4D16-2408·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm on all issues, as the February 12, 2015 final order did not contain a specific reservation of the court’s jurisdiction to permit a supplemental complaint post judgment to add a third party. See Ross v. Wells Fargo Bank, 114 So.3d 256, 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to seek relief against any third parties in a separate civil action.

Affirmed,

Damoorgian, Gerber and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We affirm on all issues, as the February 12, 2015 final order did not contain a specific reservation of the court’s jurisdiction to permit a supplemental complaint post judgment to add a third party. See Ross v. Wells Fargo Bank, 114 So.3d 256, 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Affirmance is without prejudice for appellant to seek relief against any third parties in a separate civil action.

Affirmed,

Damoorgian, Gerber and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Singer v. Singer, 219 So. 3d 944, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7539 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

219 So. 3d 944 (Singer v. Singer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related