Singer v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

30 Misc. 766
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 766 (Singer v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Singer v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co., 30 Misc. 766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Opinion

MacLean, J.

The judgment herein is not to be reversed, as contended by the appellant, upon the doctrine of Pierce v. Metropolitan St. R. Co., 21 App. Div. 427, for there is no such preponderance of evidence in favor of the defendant in this case as there was in that so cited as precedent.

Freedman, P. J., concurs; Leventritt, J., taking no part.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pierce v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
21 A.D. 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Misc. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/singer-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1899.